국내 저수지에 대한 정역학적 및 동역학적 안정해석방법의 비교 및 고찰

Comparing and Consideration of Static and Dynamic Stability Analysis Methods for Domestic Reservoirs
  • 이무재; 
  • 김용성; 
  • 허준; 
  • 박민우; 
  • 타망 비벡; 
  • 외 1명

초록

In this study, we compared and analyzed the static and dynamic analysis method for agricultural reservoirs. In addition, we assumed the aging ofreservoir as the deterioration of the internal friction angle and cohesion. The internal friction angle and cohesion were applied by dividing into 4 casefor each reservoir. As a result of comparing the stability of the reservoir embankment, it was found that the dynamic stability analysis method showed a greater risk thanthe static stability analysis method when dynamic loads such as earthquakes were applied. Therefore, when detailed review such as liquefaction is required, it is considered that the dynamic stability analysis method should be applied first. If a study on the change in material properties due to the aging of the reservoir is conducted, the stability analysis of the reservoir due to the agingof the reservoir can be performed more accurately. In addition, if a study comparing the results of dynamic stability analysis and static stability analysis for earthquakes with various characteristics formore reservoirs is conducted, detailed criteria for the case where dynamic stability analysis should be considered can be presented.

키워드

Earthquake; poorly-compacted raised reservoir levee; static and dynamic stability analysis method; liquefied
제목
국내 저수지에 대한 정역학적 및 동역학적 안정해석방법의 비교 및 고찰
제목 (타언어)
Comparing and Consideration of Static and Dynamic Stability Analysis Methods for Domestic Reservoirs
저자
이무재; 김용성; 허준; 박민우; 타망 비벡; 안성수
DOI
10.5389/KSAE.2020.62.5.073
발행일
2020-09
유형
Y
저널명
한국농공학회논문집
권
62
호
5
페이지
73 ~ 84