공동주택개발사업 참여주체의 추진단계별 인식 차이

초록

Multi-unit housing development projects involve multiple stakeholders—developers, construction companies, and support and supervision entities—who participate across several stages over a long period. Each stakeholder carries out its own tasks at every stage while collaborating with the others. Because participation purposes and roles differ, the degree to which each stakeholder perceives the importance of tasks varies accordingly. Such differences in perception can affect project progress during collaboration. In particular, from the standpoint of housing supply, problems arising during project implementation can spread into social costs such as harm to unit buyers, distortion of the regional housing market, and confusion in housing policy. However, prior research has been limited to presenting the importance of review items by implementation stage, without quantitatively comparing how participating stakeholders actually perceive these differently. This study surveyed 125 real estate development practitioners on their perceived importance of 37 review items across five implementation stages of multi-unit housing development projects, using a repeated-measures design, and analyzed the results with nonparametric statistical tests. The results showed that perceived importance of the same review items differed significantly across implementation stages for 35 of the 37 items. Differences in perception among stakeholders did not appear during the early-to-mid stages—planning, consensus-building, and plan approval—but in the later implementation–construction and disposition stages, only the developer differed significantly from the other two groups. Specifically, in the disposition stage, the developer rated registration–liquidation and disposition as more important than the other two groups did, while rating site/landowner condition analysis and traffic condition analysis—items whose review concludes early in the project—lower. These differences appear to reflect the fact that the developer’s purpose of participation differs from that of the other two groups. The developer, who bears responsibility for the entire process from planning through disposition and liquidation, perceived the importance of review items differently across implementation stages, whereas the construction company and the support/supervision entities, whose participation purposes are relatively limited, perceived the importance of review items at similar levels across stages. This study extends research on stage-wise importance in real estate development—previously reliant on small expert panels—into a stakeholder comparison based on a large-scale practitioner sample, and provides quantitative evidence on stakeholder differences in the perceived importance of review items that emerge in the later stages of a project.

키워드