세 개의 벽 : 신도시 유휴 상업시설의 시니어 레지던스 전환을 막는 제도적 작동조건

초록

This study treats the complete absence of senior residence conversions of idle commercial facilities in Korean new towns as its analytical object, using a negative case methodology. Building on Mahoney and Goertz’s (2004) possibility principle, it compares three completed Hong Kong URA cases — Lui Seng Chun, 618 Shanghai Street, and Central Market — against the absent Korean case through a three-carrier framework of entry, procedure, and burden. All three carriers operating in Hong Kong are absent in Korea, explaining why even assets reaching their Optimal Reuse Point in the K-ARP model fail to initiate conversion. This is not a compound failure but a hierarchical blockage: every qualifying asset is halted at the first wall, entry, so the procedural and burden walls never operate. Policy must therefore begin by dismantling the entry wall, though institutional sufficiency remains a necessary, not sufficient, condition.

키워드