Routine Functional Testing or Standard Care in High-Risk Patients after PCI

  • Park, Duk-Woo
  • Kang, Do-Yoon
  • Ahn, Jung-Min
  • Yun, Sung-Cheol
  • Yoon, Yong-Hoon
  • ... Lee, Bong-Ki
  • 외 13명
Citations

WEB OF SCIENCE

62
Citations

SCOPUS

67

초록

Background There are limited data from randomized trials to guide a specific follow-up surveillance approach after myocardial revascularization. Whether a follow-up strategy that includes routine functional testing improves clinical outcomes among high-risk patients who have undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is uncertain. Methods We randomly assigned 1706 patients with high-risk anatomical or clinical characteristics who had undergone PCI to a follow-up strategy of routine functional testing (nuclear stress testing, exercise electrocardiography, or stress echocardiography) at 1 year after PCI or to standard care alone. The primary outcome was a composite of death from any cause, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina at 2 years. Key secondary outcomes included invasive coronary angiography and repeat revascularization. Results The mean age of the patients was 64.7 years, 21.0% had left main disease, 43.5% had bifurcation disease, 69.8% had multivessel disease, 70.1% had diffuse long lesions, 38.7% had diabetes, and 96.4% had been treated with drug-eluting stents. At 2 years, a primary-outcome event had occurred in 46 of 849 patients (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 5.5%) in the functional-testing group and in 51 of 857 (Kaplan-Meier estimate, 6.0%) in the standard-care group (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.61 to 1.35; P=0.62). There were no between-group differences with respect to the components of the primary outcome. At 2 years, 12.3% of the patients in the functional-testing group and 9.3% in the standard-care group had undergone invasive coronary angiography (difference, 2.99 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.01 to 5.99), and 8.1% and 5.8% of patients, respectively, had undergone repeat revascularization (difference, 2.23 percentage points; 95% CI, -0.22 to 4.68). Conclusions Among high-risk patients who had undergone PCI, a follow-up strategy of routine functional testing, as compared with standard care alone, did not improve clinical outcomes at 2 years.

키워드

PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTIONDUAL ANTIPLATELET THERAPYHEART-ASSOCIATIONAMERICAN-COLLEGEELUTING STENTSTASK-FORCEOUTCOMESREVASCULARIZATIONANGIOGRAPHYECHOCARDIOGRAPHY
제목
Routine Functional Testing or Standard Care in High-Risk Patients after PCI
저자
Park, Duk-WooKang, Do-YoonAhn, Jung-MinYun, Sung-CheolYoon, Yong-HoonHur, Seung-HoLee, Cheol HyunKim, Won-JangKang, Se HunPark, Chul SooLee, Bong-KiSuh, Jung-WonYoon, Jung HanChoi, Jae WoongKim, Kee-SikChoi, Si WanLee, Su NamPark, Seung-JungPOST-PCI Invest
DOI
10.1056/NEJMoa2208335
발행일
2022-09
유형
Article
저널명
New England Journal of Medicine
387
10
페이지
905 ~ 915