Mechanical thrombectomy of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis with use of an Arrow-Trerotola percutaneous thrombectomy device

초록

PURPOSE: To evaluate the immediate and 1-year clinical outcomes of mechanical thrombectomy with use of the Arrow-Trerotola percutaneous thrombectomy device (PTD) with or without low-dose urokinase in the treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (DVT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Mechanical thrombectomy with the PTD was performed in 25 patients with acute iliofemoral DVT. Thrombolytic therapy with low-dose urokinase was used in all patients without contraindications (n = 20). Other therapies used in combination included inferior vena cava filter insertion (n = 5), sheath aspiration thrombectomy (n = 25), and angioplasty and stent placement (n = 20). RESULTS: Initial technical and clinical success was achieved in all cases. In the 20 patients who had no contraindications to the use of urokinase, the dosage of urokinase did not exceed 1 million IU (range, 360,000-1,000,000 IU; mean, 640,000 IU). The mean time of urokinase infusion was 16 hours (range, 12-20). In five patients who had a contraindication to the use of urokinase, mechanical thrombectomy with the PTD was successful without the use of urokinase. There were no major complications. Primary patency of the stent-implanted common iliac vein segment was achieved at 1 year in 17 of 20 patients (85%). The overall 1-year clinical success rate was 92% (23 of 25 patients). Valvular insufficiency occurred in two patients (8%). CONCLUSION: The PTD is an effective mechanical thrombectomy device in the treatment of acute iliofemoral DVT with or without adjunctive urokinase thrombolysis.

키워드