문법 교육의 현실에 대한 성찰

The Retrospective Study of Teaching Grammar
  • 왕문용

초록

I analyzed korean grammar in the curriculum and the textbook of korean language arts. The results of analysis are followings. In the curriculum, korean language arts are divided 6 fields. These are listening, speaking, reading, writing, grammar and literature. The term ‘grammar’ in the curriculum is improper term. The scope and sequence of 'grammar' is incorrect. We must select the elements in 'grammar' curriculum by concrete criteria. A criteria is 'our most frequency errors in the text'. I suggest what aspects of grammar we might focus on, as we guide our students in becoming more effective communicator. The materials in the textbook of teaching grammar is weak. Teaching grammar in integrated units of textbook between grammar and other fields don't idealize scope of what aspects of grammar may be taught across the years through middle school.

키워드

teaching grammar(문법 교육)korean grammar in the curriculum(문법 교육과정)scope and sequence of school grammar(학교문법의 범위와 체계)Retrospective Study of Teaching Grammar(문법 교육에 대한 성찰)
제목
문법 교육의 현실에 대한 성찰
제목 (타언어)
The Retrospective Study of Teaching Grammar
저자
왕문용
발행일
2010-02
유형
Y
저널명
국어교육
131
페이지
311 ~ 348